Book of The Month: Fight Club

Okay just a refresher for those of you who have seen the movie:

1st RULE: You do not talk about FIGHT CLUB.
2nd RULE: You DO NOT talk about FIGHT CLUB.
3rd RULE: If someone says "stop" or goes limp, taps out the fight is over.
4th RULE: Only two guys to a fight.
5th RULE: One fight at a time.
6th RULE: No shirts, no shoes.
7th RULE: Fights will go on as long as they have to.
8th RULE: If this is your first night at FIGHT CLUB, you HAVE to fight.

Now obviously I'm about to break the first two rules of fight club. I would hope in the future when our descendants are trying to understand this generation that they would all read Fight Club the way we were made to read The Grapes of Wrath, when we were kids. This is more than just a book about anarchy and consumerism, it's possibly the only work of art that makes "white anger" relatable to minorities.(Sorry Eminem I don't get it).

We see the narrator/protagonist/antagonist and realize that despite the vapidity of the "system" and the oppressive nature of the "machine" in the end we tend to be our own worst enemies. So while you probably have Fight Club on DVD, experience the work in it's original form, it will make the movie that much better the next time you see it. I actually read it on my Iphone which I'm sure Tyler Durden would have found ironic.

Rick Ross - Teflon Don (The Albert Anastasia Edition)

updated 9:42pm Maybach Music 2 was actually supposed to be Mafia Music 2, a small but significant error my bad.

Some people may be weary of dropping 10 dollars on ITunes for an 11 track album. Other people may not be done with Rick Ross Albert Anastasia EP because first of all it's bangin, second of all three singles from Teflon Don appear on it, and third it just dropped like 6 weeks ago. But then again Teflon Don is a pretty good album. I have a solution; I know how you can turn your 11 track album into a 24 (or 25) track double cd. As a matter of fact this might be the best double cd in hip-hop by the time you're through.

Step 1 - Purchase Teflon Don. (Or download it I'm not judging you we're in a recession)

Step 2 - Download the Albert Anastasia EP (you can find it on any worthwhile torrent site, or see if the link is still on Onsmash.com)

Step 3 - Remove the following tracks from Albert Anastasia because they are redundant (meaning they already appear on Teflon Don) MC Hammer, BMF featuring Styles P, and Super High - featuring Ne-Yo

Step 4 - Re-number the tracks so that they are now 1-10

Step 5 - Download the following tracks (or just find them in your iTunes Library if previously downloaded) Super High Remix - featuring Curren$y and Wiz Khalifa, Aston Martin Music extended mix (the one with Drake's verse) - featuring Drake and Chrisette Michelle, and Mafia Music 2 featuring Chrisette Michelle,

Step 6 - Select the remaining tracks from the Albert Anastasia EP and change the album title to Teflon Don (Albert Anastasia Edition), also change the disc number to disc 2 of 2.

Step 7 - Select the actual Teflon Don Album and add "(Albert Anastasia Edition)" to the Album title and make it disc 1 of 2.

Step 8 - Add the downloaded tracks to disc 2 in the following order, Super High Remix - featuring Curren$y and Wiz Khalifa track number 11 of Disc 2, Aston Martin Music Extended Mix track number 12 of disc 2, Mafia Music 2 track number 13 of disc 2

Optional Step 9 - Only for people who aren't sick of this song yet add All I Do Is Win remix as track number 14

Now your puny 11 track album that was over before it started is a double cd that in my opinion is up there with the best of them.

What We Missed

What We Missed

Last week we were all consumed by the "Decision". I knew Lebron wasn't staying in Cleveland and had kind of hoped he would go to Chi-Town, unless you live in a cave you know he's going to Miami (although I doubt even Bin Laden doesn't know at this point).

With all that focus on NBA free agency though, I know I missed some legitimate news. Namely the fate of Johannes Mehserle (even his name is on some Nazi shit) the police officer in Cali who shot and killed an unarmed black man. The verdict in the case was involuntary manslaughter, as if there was some way you could accidentally un-holster a weapon, aim it at a person being held down by another police officer, and pull the trigger.

I don't think it's an inflammatory question when I ask: What is a black life worth? The defense for the killing of this man is that the officer intended to pull a taser. As if a taser isn't also a weapon. Anytime someone is held defenseless in a prone position the aiming and firing of any weapon shouldn't be an option. These weapons that police carry are meant to be used as tools of protection not violence. If a cop can't subdue an unarmed person without the use of arms then they aren't worth the badge they carry. And if you shoot and kill someone who is utterly defenseless, that's just plain murder.

As I've discussed previously on my blog, the relationship between the police and the African-American community will remain tenuous at best if we keep letting cops off the hook for these senseless murders. I know the cops in New Orleans can expect more than involuntary manslaughter for the execution style murders during Hurricane Katrina. And with those cops here in Philly attempting to sell heroin, the question becomes "What's the difference between the cops and the criminals", the answer "criminals don't have a union". The next time a cop gets shot we'll see if the suspect gets convicted of anything less than first degree murder regardless of the circumstances.

Early Candidate for Biggest Douchebag of The Year

Dear Mr. Gilbert,

I read your letter to the fans of Cleveland and was deeply disturbed. (For those who haven't read it, please Google it, it's crazy). For the past seven years, Cleveland, one of the worst places to live in America, was home to the greatest basketball player to never win a championship. Lebron had already wrested that title away from Charles Barkley and Karl Malone by the end of his third season. But that's not a title that anyway aspires to. You can continue to rack up regular season wins on the strength of one player, but to win in the playoffs you need a squad. Kobe and Shaq knew it in 2001, the same way Kobe and Pau Gasol know it in 2010, if Amare Stoudamire doesn't know it he's about to find out, A.I. learned the hard way.

Name a championship team with the exception of the 2004 Detroit Pistons and I'll name you two superstars (although one could argue Chauncey Billups, Rip Hamilton, Sheed Wallace and Ben Wallace all in their prime are equal to two superstars). In Cleveland you have the 40 year old version of Shaq, aka the Bret Favre of basketball, you have one of the two ugliest players in the league Varrejo (the other being Joakim Noah), you have Mo Williams and basket case Delonte West, whose mind is like a cross between Ron Artest and Dennis Rodman.

You speak of cowardly betrayal, but you just fired the coach with the best record in the NBA. You fired the GM who put together your raggedy rat pack of misfits. You have a group of players with the offense firepower of gnats, who played defense like the Mavericks. And then you put them out there with best player (to never win a championship) and expect HIM to make THEM better. You promise him help but the problem is location, location location. Joakim Noah said it best in the playoffs "Nobody ever says I want to go no vacation to Cleveland". Dwayne Wade wasn't coming to Cleveland, Carlos Boozer wasn't coming back to Cleveland. Remove Lebron from the equation and the average person wouldn't even say the word Cleveland in a given year.

Which reminds me I personally would have liked to see Lebron in Chicago, but I'm sure the shadow of another number 23 looms too large there.

I would be remiss if I didn't address directly the racial aspect of your letter. You decry Lebron as a narcissist and talk about his cowardly betrayal, as if he OWED you something. For seven years he turned one of the worst franchises in all of sports from a laughingstock, to a team that was a five or six players away from contending. Yes he was that good, and the rest of the team was that bad. As an owner of a professional (and I use that word loosely) sports team maybe there should be standards attached to your behavior. Everyone likes to paint these athletes as classless and selfish, well Mr. Gilbert I'd like you to calculate the value of your franchise in 2003 and then calculate the value in 2010, subtract the difference and then give all that money away. Your wealth and influence grew on the strength of Lebron's talent. You gladly rode his coattails. But then we African-Americans have a history of OWNERS exploiting our physical labor. When ever one of us turns the table's we get vilified. But nobody talks about how owners and fans treat athletes. You want to talk about loyalty call up Donovan Mcnabb.

Lebron's stated desire to become a billionaire, could never have been accomplished in Cleveland. His dream of winning an NBA championship could most likely never been accomplished there. Yes contrary to the Drew Carey show's theme song Cleveland most certainly does not rock.

Best Regards,

E.Knight

P.S. I personally guarantee that the Sixers, Clippers, and Bobcats will all win Championships before the Cavaliers.

The Myth of Big Government

Lately I have been trying to ignore politics, political commentary, or substantive debates of any kind.. I figured since Bill Maher is in between seasons, all I have to do is not watch Fox News, MSNBC or CNN. But like the news junkie I am, I renewed my subscription to Time Magazine and now I'm right back in it.

As you know even if you're not really a news junkie like me, since Obama's election, the Republicans have been playing obstructionists. Their policy has largely been just say no to Obama. At first people didn't seem to be buying it. But now I'm hearing this protest against "Big Government" starting to go mainstream. And it's time to call shenanigans.

These people who are rallying against "Big Government" have no idea what they're talking about. If these people are really against Big Government where were they between the years 2001-2009 when George W. Bush and co-president Dick Cheney ran roughshod all over the constitution? The hypocrisy of this crowd knows no bounds. And now this "Big Government" nonsense is hijacking the national debate.

I think it's ironic that people who know nothing about economics, try to frame the economic debate, the same way global warming deniers are enlisted to help draft our energy and environmental policies, and oil companies are allowed to tell us how safe offshore drilling is. Yes all these things are the result of "Big Government".

But most people don't know what Big Government really is. Big Government is really just a conduit for the interests of Big Business. The United States government like most "Western" nations does not exist as separate entity solely interested in its own survival. The U.S. government and the corporations contained within enjoy a symbiotic relationship. So people who say "Big Government" without invoking the specter of Big Business are being deceitful at worst, willfully ignorant at best.

A big WEAK government is different from a big STRONG government. Much the way Terry Crews differs from Rick Ross. A weak central government and nonsensical bureaucracy is why the levees weren't adequate protection for Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The failed outdated system of checks and balances is what allowed the Supreme Court to decree George W. Bush the winner in 2000. The lack of government oversight and adherence to the laissez-faire philosophy of free market economics is at the root of our current financial crisis.

The biggest government program the one that keeps us mired in unnecessary debt continues to be military spending. And you won't hear one of these talking heads on the Sunday morning political shows advocate a cut in military spending. People who talk about ending an unwinnable war are viewed as weak and hold no political clout. This forces otherwise reasonable people like the President to double down in Afghanistan even though at this point it serves no real strategic value.

A recurring theme throughout the three year history of my blog has been that people are stupid. They're stupid in their personal lives, stupid about their choices in entertainment, ignorant in their religious devotion, and complete morons when it comes to their politics. Maybe I'm not much better and I'm just too stupid to know it.

The Last Six Months of < 30

With only 6 months left of my 20's I thought each month I'd share one lesson.

Lesson 1: Never stop learning.

I've always gotten along well with older people, probably because I like being around people that I can learn from. I don't think most people in my age group have much to teach which is part of the anxiety we feel as we get older. A lot of times the people with the confidence to teach have the least wisdom to impart.

I watch the news and read Time magazine because it helps bring me new topics to learn about. Anytime I hear people generalize about a subject they barely know anything about I can add something new to the conversation, because I don't just watch the news and recycle the talking points.

Sometimes I do get mental fatigue just from being surrounded by people who have no desire to learn anything. The funny thing is I think most people reach an age where they feel like "That's enough. I don't need to know anything else." I just hope that less people stop reaching that age in their mid 20's.


Book Of The Month: The Black Swan

The full title of this book is The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. The author Nassim Nicholas Taleb is a Lebanese stock trader who has made a lot of money on Wall Street and is the world's foremost expert on randomness. I found this book to be a lot more accessible than the title implies. In a case of reverse elitism this book was written to speak directly to the layperson and go right over the head of the so-called experts.

A black swan event is something that's not expected or planned for. This is usually something that occurs outside the realm of uniformity and immediately makes all models of the currently charted future obsolete. Think of things like 9/11 or the financial crisis of 1982 (but not the one in 2008 as the second edition of the book explains, that should have been expected). This book puts severe doubt on the field of forecasting in general and specifically any forecasting as it relates to economics.

That being said I'm not saying it's an easy read. Unless you read it quickly, you will find yourself skipping to the glossary in the back to jog your memory on some of the terminology used within. Some concepts will be drilled into your head, like the ludic fallacy, Extremistan versus Mediocristan, and you'll understand why the statistics you learned in college based on the concept of standard deviation is useless in the field of economics, (which is why our financial system nearly collapsed).

Taleb's writing style is open and humorous; he includes disclaimers on which sections of the books are too dense with technical terms and can be skipped without losing any of the overall premise. He sharply questions the morality and common sense of bankers and presents most his arguments in a logical manner. He cites frequently from other writer's and philosopher's usually just to argue that the points they make aren't well thought out and their positions sometimes willfully ignorant.

He invokes the concept of skeptical empiricism often and for this reason his book exists less in the realm of philosophy and more in the realm of common sense for those that need it most. I would recommend this book to anyone with a least a high school diploma who is not scared away by words with more than three syllables (like syllable for instance) and actually wants to understand the world we live in a little better.

Afghanistan: The Lost Cause



I was reading the news earlier today about Gen McChrystal's beef with the Obama Adminsttration. and it immediately became clear to me that this war in Afghanistan is a lost cause. The rationale for the war, which was flimsy at best to begin with, is now basically non-existent.

First and foremost Afghanistan is no longer Terrorism University. If you were looking to drive the terrorists out of Afghanistan, congratulations they are now in Pakistan so that goal has largely been accomplished. (Please note the difference between the Taliban and Al-qaeda. Whereas the Taliban are insurgents, Al-qaeda are terrorists).

Secondly, this is in relation to my first point, Osama Bin Laden is no longer in Afghanistan, the best intelligence can't even confirm that he's still alive. The only evidence we have that he is alive is that Al-qaeda's leadership hasn't tried to exploit his memory for propaganda, which they most certainly will when he does kick the bucket. (Most likely due to old age). Terrorism is a crime that should be pursued by stream lined law enforcement agencies not the big clumsy machine that is the full force of the United States Military.

Thirdly, corruption is a way of life in third world countries. Rahm Emanuel, The White House Chief of Staff, drew Mchrystal's ire by making a statement about Afghan President Hamid Karzai being an unsuitable partner for the U.S.'s current mission. But Emanuel is right, Hamid Karzai is the Afghan version of John Street (Philly's mayor from 1999-2007) always one degree removed from some scandalous shit. If we wanted a real partner to help END the ware we would divorce ourselves from all things Bush. We all know by now that W and company weren't very discriminating judges of character.

Fourth some war mongerers will use the well being of the Afghan people as an excuse for war. My question to those hypocrites, is what makes the lives of Afghan babies more valuable than the lives of Rwandan babies or Sudanese babies. The U.S. has not set any precedent for intervening militarily in international affairs on the basis of the human rights of colored people. Almost all of our conflicts in modern history have been motivated by the cause of property and property holders (mostly corporations). So why change the long American tradition and turn this into some kind of humanitarian mission?

Let's be adults and admit we have made a mess in Afghanistan and any positve benefits of our military occupation are superficial and cannot be sustained. We should work on stabilizing next door neighbor Pakistan, because they have nukes. And then have them assume responsibility for Afghanistan's return to normalized tyranny. This war is a lost cause, the Taliban are practically inevitable. Let's get the tanks rolling, the jets flying, and shut down Karzai and come the hell home.

My guess is Obama's waiting until 2011 to guage the public's taste for this course of action before he makes it official. Gen. McChrystal's not accustomed to being in the spotlight while simultaneously being the head pawn in our foreign policy debate chess match. Most likely he is frustrated because he still subscribes to the outdated notion that U.S. military might shapes foreign policy and not vice versa. I bet you he votes for a repub- oops I mean for some one he can dicate to in 2012. Commander in Chief Palin would be certain to follow his script.

Drake - Thank Me Later



One day at my job, some of my co-workers were in the cafeteria waiting for their lunch I was in line behind them. One of them was a chubby white chick in her early 30s, another was a black dude in his early 40s, and the third was a black lady also in her early 40s. The conversation somehow turned to what's on the radio. The black lady was complaining about the radio stations her kids listen to and how she's sick of Usher, Lil Wayne, and Drake. The black dude revealed himself as an old school, out of touch elitist New Yorker(I work in Delaware and New York is squad deep down there seriously) when he made the following statement: "I don't understand all the hype. Drake is gah-bage (That's how he pronounced garbage, trying desperately to let everbody know that he was still hood despite the suit, tie, and alimony payments) he not even real hip-hop he's an actor from Degrassi". The white chick said " Y'all are just old Drake is my shit". I mentally high-fived her.

It's hard to ignore hype machines. It's good when cool people like and recognize something that's thorough. But when the cornballs get a hold of something they run it into the ground to the point where you almost hate it. But that's what an out of control hype machine can do. And I think for a lot of people that's what happened for them when it comes to Drake. But for those people I think a lot of them have lost focus on the most important thing if you're a hip-hop head, it should be about the music.

When I first listened to this album, I was reminded of the feeling I got when I listened to Mos Def - Black on Both Sides. I can sum that feeling up as "this is different than what I expected, but still kind of good". I don't usually do the track by track breakdown but since it's only 14 tracks I can drop a quick sentence or two about each.

"Fireworks" - (feat. Alicia Keys) This track apparently is about Rihanna. Lesson to Chris Brown when a chick does you dirty don't beat her ass, just make a song about it. I have a feeling Drake is going to be getting his hopeless romantic on with this album. Of course as a light skin dude with "good hair" he only has two options: Mr Sensitive, or Obnoxious Pretty Boy (no homo).

"Karaoke" - Never more appropriate of a song title. Because Drake's singing always sounds like Karaoke to me. I don't mean that as a diss, some people kill it on karaoke night. Of course predictably Drake's singing gets almost equal attention as his rapping on this CD. This is a disturbing trend, kind of like the reverse of Chris Brown's Gangsta Grillz. (Okay if I won't mention Chris Brown anymore).

"The Resistance" - Seriously if you don't like Drake's singing then you shouldn't get this album. If your like me and it neither bothers nor impresses you then you can listen to it just to get to the rhymes. Wisely Drake knows that crafting an album requires more subtlety than spitting a hot guest verse. So every track isn't full of verbal gymnastics. This is the third track in a row that's focused on some sort of self reflection. I guess he's saving the hardcore spitting for the second half of the album.

"Over" - This isn't exactly "hardcore" lyricism and yeah he's still being reflective but he does murk this track. I think some rappers do a lot of things well but everybody has their specialty. Drake's specialty is witty one-liners. I won't exactly call them punchlines more like jab lines because their quick and don't require a lot of time to set up. It's like a joke teller versus a stand up comedian. Hip-hop like comedy requires great timing.

"Show Me A Good Time" - More singing. Produced by Kanye, and it definitely has some 808 and Heartbreaks type flavor going on with a lot of 80's type synths and keyboards and hollow robotic drums. It's like the 80's remembered by somebody who's too young to remember the 80s.

"Up All Night" (feat. Nicki Minaj) - I'm laughing at this track, my homie Rell keeps telling me that Nicki Minaj got a little something more to her. This track is a little more evidence to support his theory. Her verse is kinda gully. Seriously.

"Fancy" (feat. Swizz Beats & T.I.) - This track is one of those "kiss ass, girl you so beautiful and independent" tracks that would be so easy to write off as pandering if there weren't so many other rappers who spend their entire albums disrespecting women. Drake does his thing, and T.I. displays his impressive knowledge of womens' fashion. (It seems like if you want to rap these days that's a prerequisite). Meanwhile Swizz Beats provides one of his mindless, addictive hooks that we all love: "Hair done, Nails Done, Everything Did".

"Shut It Down" (feat. The-Dream) - Just what we all have been asking for, a seven minute duet with The-Dream autotune included. Roger Troutman would be so proud. I guess people stopped writing T-Pain checks once they realized any asshole can sing with the proper software. I know it sounds like I'm hating, but I bang with this track.

"Unforgettable" (feat. Young Jeezy) - Interesting choice by producer Boi-1-da to sample Aaliyah singing Let Me Know on the intro and outro of this song. Young Jeezy lends some of his hood sensibility to the hook to offset Drake's singing. Then he lays down one of those "I'm in the trap" verses that we love. It's hard to classify Jeezy's rhymes. You could call it simple but if it was easy to blow up everybody would do it. Either way this might be the best track on the album so far.

"Light Up" (feat. Jay-Z) - I might be the only dude with a high speed internet connection or car radio that didn't hear this track before the album dropped. I'm just going to get right to the point Jay-Z sounds dangerous on this track. Atypically he's actually showing us that he's mad. Maybe Sigel is doing to 2010 Jay what Jay did to 2001 Nas which is to wake a sleeping giant. Still it's going to take more than these subtle jabs to counter Beanie Sigel's gut shots.

"Miss Me" (feat. Lil Wayne) - They brought in Bun B to say "Drake you get em right?" that seems like a waste. If you got Bun B in the lab with you how do you not ask him to drop a verse? It would have made this song that much better. Drake and Weezy make each other better. Some would have you believe thats because one of them is writing for the other one (and by some I mean Pusha from the Clipse). But either way this song is everything you love (or hate) about the Drake/Weezy combo. The reason why Wayne isn't all over this album is because they're doing a Drake/Lil Wayne album sometime when Wayne gets out of Riker's.

"Cece's Interlude" - Some more crooning. I could probably live without this track. You can never tell what's going to grow on you later, but thankfully it's brief so if I end up hating it, it won't kill me.

"Find Your Love" - Apparently that last song was just to set up this song. And this is yet another fake 808 and Heartbreaks outtake by Drake. (Say that three times fast). Full disclosure I liked 808s and Heartbreaks.

"Thank Me Now" - This is the culmination of your listening experience. This track is basically the Drake you've come to know over the past year and some change. He talks a lot about getting on and how it is to be an upcoming star. That may seem a little self serving until you realize that every rapper is a self promoter. And it could be worse he could be lying to us about his days a crack slinging, gun-toting, woman abuser.

Don't be surprised when you hear some people call this album a classic and twenty minutes later someone else call it complete garbage. Unfortunately in this day and age that kind of hyperbole can not be avoided. In my humble opinion this album falls short of my personal qualifications for a classic. It is a solid debut definitely miles above most of the mediocre crap put out by people Drake's age. There I go sounding like that 40 year old New-Yorker.

God Bless You

A friend asked me today if as an atheist I say "God Bless You" when people sneeze. The answer is no except for my girlfriend because she has a thing about that. The real reason I don't say God Bless You or even Bless You to people isn't so much the atheism, it's usually the context of the sneeze. Usually I'm so inwardly focused that a sneeze is just background noise to me.

But there are so many other reasons not to say God Bless You. First of all there is the reason people say God Bless You in the first place. The origins of God Bless You. Nobody knows the true origin but here are the three most common theories.

1) Some think that the phrase God Bless You originated during the Bubonic Plague, when people believed sneezing was an early symptom.
2) At an earlier point in history it was taught that a sneeze was releasing evil spirits and that by saying God Bless You, you were protecting someone's soul.
3) Another more modern belief is that when you sneeze your heart stops.

Okay so explanation number 1 is no longer worth considering. Basically the Bubonic Plague is no longer common so if someone sneezes, I won't be saying God Bless You or Bless You or anything at all based upon that assumption.

Explanation number 2 is ridiculous whether you're an atheist or not. If you think sneezing releases evil spirits from your body, I'm wondering who taught you to read. Okay let me not be so dismissive. There are some people who believe that spirits come out of your body, these same people also believe that if you take a picture of them you capture a small piece of their soul. If you know anybody like this don't worry they can't come into your house unless you invite them.

Explanation number 3 is seemingly the least ridiculous of the set. But that's what makes it worse. Because rational people will casually subscribe to this pseudoscience and use it to justify the unnecessary protocol of "God Bless You" more frequently than any other reason. When my girlfriend was annoyed with me for not saying "God Bless You" or "Bless You" she was well aware of my religious beliefs, but believed I should say God Bless You because after all her heart did just stop.

I didn't believe it then, but rather than argue my point, I let it go. And since that time I make a very very conscious effort to say something, anything, to verbally acknowledge the fact that she just sneezed. Even though it goes against every fiber of my being and means absolutely nothing to me, it means something to her. So what's three one syllable words? Approximately .8 seconds of my life. I guess I can spare that.

P.S. According to ask.com your heart does NOT stop when you sneeze.

"No, your heart does not stop when you sneeze. You take a deep breath and hold it, which tightens your chest muscles. The pressure of air in your lungs increases, your tongue presses against the roof of your mouth and a sudden breath comes out through your nose. That is one of the many wonders of the body!" - Ask.com

You might as well say God Bless You when someone hiccups.

Forgotten Classics: Gza/Genius - Liquid Swords



1995 was an extremely good year for hip-hop. Just on the strength of Cuban Linx from Raekwon, and The Infamous from Mobb Deep, not to mention Jealous One's Envy from Fat Joe, "I Shot Ya" by LL Cool J was blowing up radio, as well as Method Man and Redman's "How High" the song that was a hint of bigger things to come. *(Including two albums, a movie, and a sitcom). You also had Busta Rhymes ready to blow up on the solo tip, Biggie solidifying his status as New York's king with the Junior Mafia album, "Who Shot Ya" and "One More Chance" remix, as well as the height of the "east coast/west coast" beef when Suge dissed Puffy at the Source Awards and then scooped up Tupac right out of jail.

There was a lot going on in 1995. And I didn't even get around to mentioning Ol Dirty Bastard who changed the game when he dropped his first album with such gems as "Brooklyn Zoo, Raw Hide, and Shimmy Shimmy Ya". So it goes to reason that when you think of 1995 it's very easy to casually overlook Liquid Swords.

When it dropped there were still enough Wu-fanatics for it to register. Today those Wu-heads that are left wax nostalgic about Raekwon's Cuban Linx, and Ol Dirty's Return to the 36 chambers, both of which are classic material, but Liquid Swords is almost an afterthought.

But I'd advise everyone to go upstairs to your mom's attic and get your old cd collection out, rip this and put it on your iTunes, immediately.

These are weird RZA beats, back when RZA was so good that his weird shit was still 20 times better than most producers' normal shit. These are drug raps, story raps, nerd raps, it's almost like Wu was every genre. Still not many were in their zone like this one of the crowning acheivements of the Purple Tape era. Complete with comic book style cover and a great video for 4th Chamber/ShadowBoxing. Next time your ready for a trip down memory lane. Start with some WU.





Lost Without "Lost"



Week 1 without Lost. No mysteries to solve. No smoke monsters or runaway polar bears. No cynical doctors, miraculously healed paraplegics, hot brunette fugitive chicks, bickering Korean couple, overweight lottery winners, Iraqi soldiers, or redneck con artists. No magical disappearing island, no blond hair, blue eyed saviors, or millionaires with armed brigades.

Sure I can fill the void with Entourage, Weeds, True Blood (although it's kind of yag) and Mad Men this summer (it's official all good shows come on cable now), but what happens in the fall? I guess the "Seinfeld" theory of leaving on a high note while your show is still popular and still on point creatively is cool. I think Heroes would have been better if it bowed out gracefully after season 3. And my fellow 24 fans have to admit that Season 6, 7, and 8 weren't anywhere near the peak of the show. Speaking of which, no more 24 either.

Lost was the show for people who didn't want to go "full" geek. It was Sci-fi, but it was drama, it was a lot of action, it was a little comedy, and for the chicks some romance. It had it's own language, it could be repetitive at times, it could get slow at times, and Kate has to be the most fickle (and therefore most realistic) female character in decades.

My only beef with the show is the lameness and irrelevance of all the African-American characters, but that's not just Lost that's pretty much every show on TV with the exception of the Cleveland Show and The Boondocks. (It's a shame the best black characters on TV are cartoons, but that's a subject for a whole other post.)

I could just jump head first into reality TV like everyone else. There's plenty of shows about women who had sex with somebody rich and/or famous. Or washed entertainment starts looking for love, or in rehab, or trying to lose weight, or learning how to dance, or taking orders from Donald Trump. Yes this is the bullshit they call TV today, and people say I'm the one fixated on a fantasy world. Well at least Lost admits it's fiction.

Late Pass: Roc Marciano - Marcberg



There's a certain sound in New York hip-hop that you don't hear as much these days. The gritty street rap that characterized the pre-Shiny suit era of the nineties, is largely missing from today's rap scene. Today even "hard" rappers have a neat orderly cleanliness about their production. So when somebody tells you that an artist is "taking it back" to that grimy era, you kind of roll your eyes and go "yeah right".

Then you hear the second track on Roc Marciano's Marcberg (the first track is just an intro) and you nod your head, and even if you've never heard of dude, if you're a true hip-hop head, you can't front. This dude is definitely on to something. I don't know if it was his intention to take you back to 95 but this album is virtually a time machine. This album justifies the nostalgic feeling you get when you think about the 90's. And I'm not just talking about the artists that are still around today. Not just the Wu-Tang, Nas and Mobb Deep. But I mean that New York shit, like the first time you heard "MVP" by Big L, or "Best Kept Secret" by Diamond D.

None of these tracks would sound out of place on a "I Love The 90's mixtape" right between "Danger" by Blahzay Blahzay and "Mad Izm" by Channel Live. This is the audio equivalent of throwback Jordans.

If you need a brief background on this dude he's not a brand new artist, he was down with Flipmode for the brief second when they were a credible rap crew. Don't be embarrassed if you don't remember that, but trust me it happened. He has his own squad called the UN, never heard any of that stuff, but other heads tell me its quality stuff. Despite the fact that he has industry connects with legendary producers like Pete Rock, and DJ Premier, this entire album is self produced. And when you hear these beats (if you cop off of iTunes it comes with the instrumentals) you'll understand why.

I think the art of sampling is in danger but these beats are showing today's producers that less is more. Along with rhymes that manage to convey the street life without being over the top. Still not convinced and need to know whether or not this album is for you, download one track "Snow". If you can't bang with that, this isn't for you.

Book of The Month: The Book Your Church Doesn't Want You To Read



I guess word is getting out around the office about my (lack of ) religious beliefs. I read this book because a co-worker left it on my desk at work. It took me a while because a lot of the stuff in the beginning was old news to me and right in the middle of it I found the previous book of the month. It's basically a collection of essays giving us little factual tidbits about the origins of people's religious beliefs. It's not some sort of guide to atheism or an attempt to convert believers into non-believers. Mainly the collected authors pick apart specific events and customs within the bible and put them into historical context.

The main focus is on Christianity, but it briefly delves into every major modern religion. Some of the topics include the views of Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine, the dead sea scrolls, as well as the origins of the Gospels. The book also gives us some background into revisions that were made to the bible, and some of the stories and beliefs that pre-date the bible by thousands of years.

The bottom line is even if you cling to your misguided beliefs out of habit, you should realize that your holy books are collected and transcribed by men with agendas. Whenever I have a discussion with an ardent believer about my lack of belief, I hear the phrase "But the bible says...." about 90 friggin times. If part of my belief is that bible is full of misconceptions at best and downright lies at worst, then why would I care what the Bible says. I hate to say it but the only context in which religious texts are worth being considered is the historical one. And for that reason I give this book my full recommendation.

The Message

Trying to explain hip-hop to somebody who doesn't listen to any rap at all is kind of hard. But sometimes you run across a curious middle aged white lady and you have to explain the whole point, because all they know is what they hear on the news and the limited amount of rap that they come in direct contact with. But more than the mechanics of rap( why a particular rhyme is clever, why a beat is considered good, etc) I find myself explaining the message.

Hip-hop is often accused (sometimes rightfully so) of glorifying crime, drug abuse, misogyny and violence. We have hip-hop that attempts to teach, educate, enlighten etc, it's just that much of this hip-hop, isn't very good. Nowadays today's commercial rap scene seems to have very few messages. Rappers have largely become caricatures as opposed to the characters they used to be. When you hear the name Jay-Z today you are more likely to think of his business savvy then his rhyme skill. And I think that's why hip-hop is losing a little vitality because we are finding it hard to separate the two.

If you were looking for one constant in hip-hop, the one message that has endured throughout the brief history of hip-hop, it's definitely the grind. Hip-hop simultaneously disavows and promotes the "American dream". The common misconception is that if you work hard you can go from poor to rich simply by your own will. Black people should understand better than most others how false this is. Hip-hop's twist is that you should do whatever it takes to make it, even if it includes being violent, breaking the law, and a general disdain for all the things mainstream aka "white" America holds dear. It's clear enough that hip-hop still has some rebel left in it. But in it's tacit rejection of American values it sometimes throws out the gold with the garbage. Take for instance Kanye West. On his first two albums College Dropout and Late Registration, he mocks higher education on his skits. People should know that a college degree isn't worth what it used to be, but suggesting that you'd be better off without one is irresponsible.

At the same time hip-hop seems to embrace the TRUE values of America. The lawlessness and self importance that are characteristic of our country's history are reflected in the big egos of today's emcees. The materialism and financial recklessness that are necessary to power our consumer driven economy are promoted everyday by basically every rapper, even the "conscious" ones. The attitudes toward women that range from exploitative at worst to patronizing at best, didn't originate in hip-hop either. Violence may be America's top export, examine history try to find a time when America wasn't invading, occupying, or intervening on foreign soil with a gun in one hand and often times a bible in the other. And as for the Drugs, All of America is on Drugs not just the "hood", the sooner we come to terms with that the better off we'll be.

Hip-Hop is just a gigantic mirror held up in America's face. Take off that mask of false pride and patriotism and you'll see most people are just desperate to get paid. That desperation is in the music, every rapper from Jay-Z to the 17 year old kid outside of your Chinese store raps about the grind, the hustle or the struggle. And they all believe they'll overcome it. Some come closer than others.

P.S. Check me out guest-blogging on byroncrawford.com

Forgotten Classics: Moment of Truth



Some people are allergic to the radio. Hip-hop heads in particular have an aversion to mainstream radio and usually only listen when the CD player in their car gets busted. As such hip-hop music in order to transcend from the level of merely good to classic has to have longevity. You ever have someone ask you if you were going to be stuck on a desert island and could only bring 5 cds what would they be? For regular people that's a tough question. But for a hip-hop head you could expand that to 50 cds and the question would be just as tough. But Moment of Truth would make my list even if it didn't make most others.

When I first got my Iphone last year, the very first day I purchased two albums off of Itunes. One of those albums was Gang Starr's classic Moment of Truth. The status of this album as a classic is disputed I can acknowledge that. But listening to it now it has all the elements necessary to be labeled a true hip-hop classic. DJ Premier has better individual beats then the ones on this cd but he doesn't have a better collection of 20 tracks. Likewise Guru seemed to understand on this album way back in 1998 how to be an elder statesman in hip-hop. The theme of this album is like a personal revelation of maturity. Tracks like "Work", "Royalty"," Above The Clouds","JFK 2 LAX" and "What I'm Here 4" can't be rightly characterized as "conscious" rap. A better label would be serious rap.

Some of our favorite emcees present us with characters and even caricatures of themselves. It takes a truly special talent though to give us entertaining thought provoking hip-hop without putting on a facade. Guru's deadpan monotone and stoic delivery is somehow more capable of conveying the meaning of his lyrics then any of today's swagger obsessed D-Boy emcees or falafel eating vegan conscious anti-thugs.

While this album wouldn't rightly be considered groundbreaking, it is a perfect example of hip-hop done right. It's a shame that sometimes it takes the passing of hip-hop legend to make you remember. So I encourage you all, hip-hop heads or not, the next time you turn your radio off in disgust, to reach for a CD from your favorite forgotten rapper and remember that all hip-hop doesn't have to be about selling crack or saving the world, there is a middle ground. Regular rap for regular people that's what Gang Starr was. That's who Guru was.


R.I.P. Keith "Guru" Elam

Arizona Apartheid

Apartheid is described as "a system of legal racial segregation enforced by the National Party government in South Africa between 1948 and 1994, under which the rights of the majority black inhabitants of South Africa were curtailed and minority rule by whites was maintained". In the 1980's it was fashionable in America to boycott South Africa because of their policies towards blacks. Now we must boycott the state of Arizona for their policies towards Latinos.

Racism and Hypocrisy go hand in hand. A lot of people in this country are always up in arms about illegal immigration. They act as if they themselves aren't the product of immigration. The legality of any form of immigration must be questioned when this entire landmass of North America was obtained by the genocide of the indigenous people.

But it seems lately that most of us get our civics lessons from middle aged white men who dropped out of school in the 8th grade. The fury of ignorance is the fuel that powers the engine of politics. The law of the land in Arizona is that currently if the police have any reason to suspect you are an illegal immigrant (like say for instance your skin, or that funny language you speak) they can stop you and ask for some I.D. Just like in ...you guessed it South Africa (also Nazi Germany if you want to get dramatic about it).

You can punish illegal immigrants if you want to Arizona but please don't deny that your racists. A lot of people like to say illegal immigrants come here and take the jobs that most Americans won't do. But that's just not true. They take wages and the working conditions that most Americans won't take. Large corporations hire them because they know they won't have to provide health care, a living wage, or favorable work conditions. Lax enforcement of labor laws combined with corporations' addiction to cheap labor, along with the repressive economic policies of Latin America make illegal immigration a no brainer.

Why would you respect an imaginary line in the sand drawn over land that belonged to your ancestors anyway? U.S. drug laws have turned Mexico into a war zone. And that huge southwestern portion of our country really basically was Mexico until about 165 years ago. But then again Arizona is the home state of John McCain. The same dude who voted against celebrating Martin Luther King's birthday and then apologized ...25 years later. Sheesh.

Book of the Month: A People's History of The United States

When I was in third grade I went to the eye doctor and got my eyes checked. That is when I learned I needed glasses. When I put the glasses on, it was like I was seeing the world for the first time. Before that I had no idea how bad my vision really was. I didn't complain about my vision because I didn't know that there was a better way to see. I am reminded of that feeling after reading this book.

Howard Zinn gives us a view of history unfiltered by the patriotism and national pride that is used to indoctrinate us all as schoolchildren. As an African-American I've always been resistant to the mainstream view of history that is used to denigrate, degrade and debase me but without an alternative I was forced to accept it as basically the truth. As I grew older and my knowledge of the world increased, my skepticism not only about the way the world was presented but about the motives of those who would present it has grown tremendously. This book serves as the confirmation and validation of what I and many other people have always felt to be true.

This book touches on many topics in American History that have been taught deceptively, incompletely or not at all. The best example is the very first chapter of the book, which reexamines Christopher Columbus and his famous "discovery of America". What we are not taught in our traditional history class is that he inflicted the first recorded case of genocide in the new world and set the tone for the injustices that were yet to come.

Our history classes have downplayed the racial inequality, the violence, the social injustice that has historically been perpetrated by the government of The United States against its own people since the founding of the nation. This book illuminates the dark corners of our national history. Racism and violence aren't just admonished, the root causes are explored and we learn that the true history of the U.S. has been concealed in a muddled cloud of deception.

After reading this book we learn that nearly all of the military conflicts and foreign interventions in our nation's history have been motivated by the interests of the few and not the needs of the many. This should not be surprising as the very existence of our country is based upon the needs of wealthy white landowners.

This book also outlines the motivation of some of history's most infamous events including the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, the attack on Pearl Harbor, the bombing of Hiroshima, the Bay of Pigs fiasco, the Vietnam War, the creation of Panama, the Iran-Contra affair and many many others.

A People's History is the book that we should all read. If you only read one or two books a year, then please make this one of them. If you have been "educated" by our school system (public or private) with regards to American History; you have been inculcated with propaganda and disinformation. Yet that may have been necessary to fully appreciate the most valuable lesson in this book: "..there is no such thing as a pure fact, innocent of interpretation. Behind every fact presented to the world - by a teacher, a writer, anyone - is a judgment. The judgment that has been made is that this fact is important, and that other facts, omitted, are not important." By seeing what the Establishment has chosen to exclude we see how important we are in the eyes of the powers that be.

Today, we have in Texas a school board that is choosing to limit the teaching of Thomas Jefferson in their texts and in Virginia the Governor is downplaying the role of slavery while cherishing the memory of the Confederacy. You have a Tea Party movement supposedly dedicated to the cause of high taxes even though their taxes have gone down. Their protests mock the proud tradition of true insurrection provoked by injustice that is chronicled in this book.

Howard Zinn has shattered the myth that surrounds such historical figures as John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, both Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt and of course the first "black president" Bill Clinton. Through it all Democrats and Republicans are seen as furthering and extending the domination of corporate interests in the advancement of militarism and deemphasizing the need for social services at home. The only president that even seems concerned about the status quo is Republican Dwight Eisenhower who famously warned of the growing influence of the military-industrial complex.

Howard Zinn manages to deconstruct all the social barriers put in place to maintain the status quo through the 200 plus years of this nation's history. One wonders what he would make of the election of Barack Obama, the current economic crisis, the health care reform package and the current attempt at financial reform. He passed away earlier this year so he'll never get a chance to write those chapters. But perhaps if we have the ability the see the world for what it truly is we won't need another Howard Zinn. So I'm inviting everyone to read this book and see the world for the first time.

Life Lessons From Monopoly



When I was in school at Drexel University a long long time ago (I'm 29 you do the math) some friends of mine used to meet up in the dorms and play monopoly. My homies Jon, Chuck, Quinn and a few others. Maybe two or three times a week we would meet up and play with at least 4 players preferably 6 or sometimes even more. Anyone who's ever played Monopoly knows that the game can be long, intricate, and complex. Ultimately like most strategy games it can become more about the way the people who play it relate to each other than any type of skill or expertise.

The goal of Monopoly is to purchase property and charge rent to those who land on the property represented on the board. Every player starts out with the same amount of money and basically the same opportunity to purchase every unowned property they land on. In addition to the rules that come with the game, another concept of fairness and standards start to form around the fact that sometimes in order to establish a Monopoly( basically to own every property in a certain price class represented by the colors on the board) you have to sometimes trade other properties and cash with other players. Properties are developed and rents skyrocket. Eventually other players on the board who aren't collecting enough rent from their property( usually due to their inability to deal) go bankrupt from landing on the highly developed properties of their competitors. The shrewdest players are the ones who can convince people that know they are in open competition that even though their downfall is inevitable the best way to stay alive is to make a deal.

I think of Monopoly and the concept of ownership every single time I hear about this retarded economy and the sorry state of financial reform. They talk about the record bonuses of these wall street firms, the corruption, the ethically challenged and possibly criminal actions of bankers, lawyers, insurance firms and government officials. And then the fuzzy accounting practices of the banks and these ticking time bomb adjustable rate mortgages, confirm what I already know. These CEOs and executives aren't very good at Monopoly. They have been stretching the game out for one hundred and fifty years though, since before there was even a board game called Monopoly. And they are making deals with each other. Except the people who suffer from the astronomical rents are us. And Obama wants to do to them, what my homey Jon did back at Drexel. Ban players who make dumb deals from the game( at least temporarily).


Teflon Ben



I hope you're not easily shocked but Ben Roethelisberger didn't get charged with rape, again. He didn't get put through the ringer like Kobe. Nope the authorities chose not to press charges, again. You could make the argument that this was just one random crazy broad accusing an athlete of rape. IF this wasn't the SECOND time in three years. Come on man. Could you imagine what would happen to Michael Vick if he looked at a poodle the wrong way. If Vick accidentally hits a dog with his car, if he slaps a dog, if he orders a hot dog, shit if he gets in a fight with DMX, he'll be crucified.

Speaking of crucifixion, I'm bout sick of all this Tiger Woods and Jesse James bashing on TV. As if celebrities cheating on their wives was something brand new and shocking. First big bad Tiger Woods, the least threatening Negro on the planet. To paraphrase Dave Chappelle,"[ Tiger Woods] makes Bryant Gumbel look like Malcolm X". But we keep hearing about how he's a sex addict, and he's losing endorsements. Over what exactly? Does anybody know how many kids Evander Holyfield had? And what about all those NBA players with scattered conquests throughout all 48 contiguous states and Hawaii? Which just goes to show you people don't view golf as a sport or golfers as athletes. Because an athlete cheating on his wife isn't news. And we shouldn't care. Before you judge Tiger ask yourself do any of your friends treat their significant others bad or cheat on them. Of course they do.

Let's move on to Sandra Bullock. What is it about successful women that makes them gravitate towards the "bad boy with a heart of gold". Sandra took one look at Jesse James and said: " Sure he's a tattooed, motorcycle driving, Neo-Nazi and I'm one of Hollywood's leading ladies but I think I can change him into a respectable man, if I try really hard". Well I got a question for Sandra and all the women like her attracted to the roughnecks, thugs, and bad boys: If you pick up a snake and the snake bites, whose fault is it the snake's or yours?



About Me

E.Knight
Doing what the hell I want for as long as I can. eknight81@yahoo.com
View my complete profile